3

Revision of the Medical Device Directive (MDD) – Manufacturer´s responsibility increased

back


The Medical Device Directive 93/42/EEC (MDD) will change per March, 21st 2010 without transition period. The efforts for the reclassification of total joint replacements such as for hip, knee and shoulder are just closed, manufactures have to face the new challenge of the revised medical device directive. Those, who have not yet implemented the changes, will run out of time and will possibly have to deal with non-comformance, which immediately puts in question the approval of their devices.


Two major changes concern the qualification of equipment and process validation:


Software will be regarded as a medical device as long as it satisfies the general definition as a medical device. This concerns any device incorporating software or software as a standalone product. Hence, software needs to be validated according to the state-of-the-art and elementary rules of software life cycle, risk management, verification and validation shall be considered.


The other point concerns the conformity of the medical device and thus the organisation´s quality management system. In future notified bodies will have to audit not only the quality management systems of the manufacture but also those of the suppliers inclusively the sub-suppliers. As a consequence the entire manufacturing process of in-house production and outsourced process steps will have to be incorporated into the manufacture´s quality management system. Processes need to be validated in same depth and level at the suppliers and even their subsuppliers as it is done internally. At present outsourced processes were regarded very often as black boxes and only the process output was subsequently monitored. In near future notified bodies will bring light into the black boxes and directly audit suppliers and also sub-suppliers. The audits will not only focus on the part of the outsourced service but also on the quality management system in general. Hence, referencing to the supplier´s ISO 13485 certification will not satisfy. Both systems need to be comparable to each other and at the requirements at the same level. In most cases the quality system requirements of the manufacturer will be on a higher level than at the supplier. The challenge will be to get the suppliers into the boat and establish the same requirements. This is relevant for any outsourced process i.e. development, production, assembling and quality control of medical devices.